Supreme Court
The bail plea of BRS leader and MLA K. Kavitha in the Delhi liquor scam case was heard in the Supreme Court today. The case was heard by a bench of Justice BR Gavai and Justice K. V. Vishwanathan. Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appeared on behalf of K. Kavitha. During the hearing, the court asked the ASG to prove that she has destroyed the evidence. The investigation has been completed, the chargesheet has been filed. There are 493 witnesses in this case. She is a woman. Why should she not be granted bail? After this, she was granted bail.
no chance of running away
During the hearing, advocate Mukul Rohatgi argued that K. Kavitha is still an MLA, the investigation in the CBI and ED case has been completed. The total number of witnesses in both the cases is 493 and the total number of documents is about 50,000 pages. She is a former MP and there is no possibility that she will run away from justice.
Manish Sisodia has got bail
Rohatgi further said that Manish Sisodia has been granted bail in this case. Generally, women get bail. On this, the bench said that you are not a weak woman. It does not matter whether you are an MLA or MLC. It is alleged that Rs 100 crore was sent to Delhi from the South Lobby, but no recovery was made. I have not formatted any phone, as is being alleged.
Kavita’s behavior is like bullying- ASG
On this, ASG Raju argued that Kavita’s behavior was like tampering with evidence and threatening witnesses. On checking her phone, it was found that there was no data in it. On this, the bench said that people delete messages. I also have a habit of deleting.
ASG Raju further told the bench that people delete messages, they do not format the entire phone. K. Kavitha did not format the original device but created other devices. No one deletes messages or history.
What proof do you have? – SC
SC asked ED and CBI what evidence do you have against K. Kavitha? K. Kavitha has done a lot for Indian politics and people. K. Kavitha is an educated woman. She has a hold in the society. On this ASG Raju said but all this cannot be the basis for bail. CDR has revealed that the accused have been talked to on the phone.
Why should bail not be granted?
SC said that formatting the phone and destroying evidence are two different things. You prove that they have destroyed the evidence. The investigation has been completed, chargesheets have been filed. There are 493 witnesses in this case. She is a woman. Why should she not be granted bail? After this, the Supreme Court granted bail to BRS leader K. Kavitha in both ED and CBI cases.
The court also rejected the order of Delhi High Court in which their bail plea was rejected. The Supreme Court has directed each of them to fill a bail bond of Rs 10 lakh, not to tamper with witnesses and not to influence witnesses. For information, let us tell you that K. Kavitha has been in jail for 5 months.
Also read:
‘Om’ and snow disappeared from the world famous Om mountain in Uttarakhand, why did the snowy mountain turn black? Video surfaced
Latest India News