The lawyer of the accused said in the court that the ground on which remand has been given earlier, sought it again.
Police custody of the accused is not necessary from where the documents are to be collected.
Morbi. After the massive loss of life in the Morbi bridge accident, after the completion of the four-day remand of the arrested accused, they were again produced in the court. Demanding cross verification, the police produced the accused in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate MJ Khan and sought additional remand for five more days, but the Chief Justice rejected the remand application.
Police officers and public prosecutors have made many arguments regarding this matter. What is the role of accused Dinesh Dave and Deepak Parekh who are the managers of Oreva Company? When was the meeting held in the collector’s office and the municipality and who were present in that meeting. Documents have been sought from Morbi Collector Office, Rajkot Collector Office and Morbi Municipality for their documents. It will be decided only after the document arrives that what is the role of Dinesh and Deepak.
The lawyer of the accused opposed the police remand
Explaining the need for Fardhar remand of both the accused for interrogation of the accused and investigation of this accident, the police officer and the public prosecutor argued in the court. Whereas the counsel for the accused told the court that on the ground on which remand has been given earlier, remand has been sought again on the same ground.
On the demand of remand, the lawyer of the accused said in the court that from where the documents are to be collected, they have to be taken from all the government courts, then the police custody of the accused is not necessary. After this, the remand application was rejected.
Tags: Gujarat news, Gujarat Police, Morbi Bridge
FIRST PUBLISHED : November 05, 2022, 19:26 IST